目录
- 1 王媛
- 2 一、生平与学术经历
- 3 二、主要研究领域
- 4 相关著作
- 5 相关文献
- 5.0.1 1.《Individual agency in South-South policy transfer: China and Ethiopia’s industrial park development》
- 5.0.2 2.《Chinese capital, regulatory strength and the BRI: A tale of ‘fractured development’ in Cambodia》
- 5.0.3 3.《Presidential extraversion: Understanding the politics of Sino-African mega-infrastructure projects》
- 5.0.4 更多相关资料
王媛
一、生平与学术经历
王媛,北京大学国家发展学院助理教授,主要从事中非关系、非洲政治和国际发展研究。她本科毕业于上海外国语大学,获法学学士学位;后赴美国哈佛大学肯尼迪政府学院攻读公共管理硕士,并在英国牛津大学获得政治学硕士和政治学博士学位。2021年7月获得牛津大学政治学博士学位后,她于2021—2022年先后在哥伦比亚—哈佛中国与世界项目及哥伦比亚大学韦瑟黑德东亚研究中心从事博士后研究。进入北京大学国家发展学院任教前,曾任昆山杜克大学国际关系助理教授。
王媛早期的研究和工作经历与国际发展及中非合作实践联系较为紧密。她曾在联合国开发计划署驻华办公室以及中非卓越基金会肯尼亚办公室工作,并在相关实践中接触中国企业海外经营、中非经济合作以及非洲发展问题。这些经历也为她后来从政治学和国际发展视角研究中非关系提供了较为具体的实践基础。
目前,王媛在北京大学国家发展学院从事教学与研究工作,讲授《案例研究方法》《国际发展前沿理论与实践》等课程。她的研究以中国与非洲国家之间的基础设施合作、发展政策互动和国家治理为重要议题,研究对象主要涉及肯尼亚、埃塞俄比亚等非洲国家。
二、主要研究领域
王媛的研究主要集中于中非关系、非洲政治和国际发展,其中基础设施合作和发展政策是其研究中较为突出的议题。她尤其关注中国参与非洲基础设施建设过程中,中国与非洲国家政府、政治领导人以及其他行为主体之间的互动,并从政治制度、国家能力和行动者自主性等角度解释中非合作项目的形成与实施。
非洲铁路建设是王媛研究的重要对象。她长期以肯尼亚和埃塞俄比亚的铁路项目为案例,考察中国参与非洲大型基础设施建设的政治过程。《Executive Agency and State Capacity in Development: Comparing Sino-African Railways in Kenya and Ethiopia》比较肯尼亚和埃塞俄比亚铁路项目,讨论政治领导人的行动能力与国家能力如何影响大型发展项目的推进。《Presidential Extraversion: Understanding the Politics of Sino-African Mega-Infrastructure Projects》则进一步从非洲国家政治领导人的角度分析中非大型基础设施项目的政治形成过程。
在此基础上,王媛将研究进一步延伸至中国与非洲之间的发展经验交流及政策转移。她与合作者围绕中国和埃塞俄比亚工业园区发展开展研究,关注政策从一国向另一国传播过程中具体行动者的作用以及制度环境所形成的约束,讨论南南合作中的政策学习并非简单的经验复制,而是在当地政治和制度条件下经过调整和再形成的过程。
王媛的研究也涉及“一带一路”框架下中国海外投资与当地政治、监管环境之间的关系。近年来,她关注中国国家行为主体如何应对海外项目实施过程中出现的社会和政治阻力,以及中国企业在非洲开展基础设施和科技相关项目时与当地社会之间的互动。相关研究涉及肯尼亚标准轨铁路项目、中国企业在肯尼亚的企业社会责任实践,以及“一带一路”项目中的治理和社会回应等问题。
在其学术专著《The Railpolitik: Leadership and Agency in Sino-African Infrastructure Development》中,王媛以中非基础设施合作为核心议题,进一步系统讨论非洲国家政治领导人、国家机构和中国参与者在铁路等大型基础设施项目中的作用。该书由牛津大学出版社于2023年出版,是其围绕中非基础设施合作形成的代表性研究成果。
相关著作
1.《The Railpolitik: Leadership and Agency in Sino-African Infrastructure Development》
Abstract
With Beijing’s announcement of the ‘going global’ policy in the early 2000s and the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, Chinese policy banks and state-owned companies have cooperated with African countries to finance and complete many infrastructure projects. These projects, despite their ‘Chineseness’, demonstrate starkly different development trajectories in different countries. Why do some Chinese-financed and -constructed projects develop better than others? And what explains differential African state effectiveness in public goods delivery? This book traces the process of three Chinese-sponsored railway projects in Kenya, Ethiopia, and Angola. These serve as lenses to inspect the broader phenomenon of the fast-progressing Sino-African relation and African domestic politics. The book shows that African political championship is the central factor that determines Chinese-sponsored railway outcomes. Contrary to the conventional knowledge that centralized political institutions such as those in the developmental states are more conducive to rulers’ commitment to developmental projects, it finds that political championship can be generated from leaders’ perceived threats of competitive elections in democratic states like Kenya. These Chinese-financed and -constructed projects coincided with African rulers’ strategies for political survival. These projects are therefore instrumentalized politically to demonstrate rulers’ performance legitimacy and fuel their patronage machine. The empirical evidence is collected from extensive field research in Kenya, Ethiopia, Angola, and China from 2014 to 2019. Empirical analysis is based on 250 in-depth interviews with African and Chinese government officials, corporate managers, civil society leaders, journalists, citizens, and scholars combined with episodes of participatory observation with Chinese railway contractors in Africa.
2.《China Business Perception Index》
Abstract
The Business Perception Index (BPI) has been developed to understand the Kenya-based Chinese companies’ characteristics, to understand the business and investment climate faced by Chinese enterprises, and how these conditions affect the productivity and growth of Chinese companies in Kenya. The BPI Survey-Kenya is a firm-level descriptive survey of Chinese private and state-owned enterprises in Kenya. The questionnaire includes the following ten major sections: basic firm characteristics, regulation and taxes, crime and safety, informality, gender, finance, infrastructure, trade, workforce, corruption, and obstacles analysis. We reached out through email and telephone to 184 Chinese establishments in Kenya, and 75 companies accepted the survey.
相关文献
1.《Individual agency in South-South policy transfer: China and Ethiopia’s industrial park development》
摘要:This article process-traces Ethiopia’s adoption and implementation of the industrial park development strategy from the mid 2000s to the late 2010s. How does policy transfer unfold, and what characterizes China’s influence on Ethiopia’s Special Economic Zone (SEZ) strategy? Drawing on extensive interviews conducted during multiple field trips to Ethiopia and China between 2017 and 2023, complemented by secondary sources, we argue that policy transfer involves navigating both structural opportunities—providing incentives and resources for individuals—and individual agency to surmount structural constraints. Contributing to the growing body of literature on South-South policy transfer, our study underscores the pivotal role of individual agency in overcoming prevalent structural constraints within South-South contexts, characterized by fluid power relations and less defined policy transfer networks. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of scrutinizing the agency of host-country actors in their engagements with a rising China, rather than assuming China’s impacts in a deterministic manner. Our detailed documentation offers a nuanced perspective on China’s influence in Ethiopia’s industrialization. We show that primary agency in the policy transfer process should be attributed to Ethiopian actors, whereas the roles of Chinese actors range from initiation, facilitation, and occasionally, reluctant responses in this intricate process.
作者:Wang, Y. & Zhang, H.
来源:Review of International Political Economy
2.《Chinese capital, regulatory strength and the BRI: A tale of ‘fractured development’ in Cambodia》
摘要:The scholarly debate on how developing countries can effectively manage Chinese-sponsored infrastructure and investment (particularly since the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative,BRI) has largely focused on cross-country variations. Less attention has been devoted to within-country variations: why can certain sectors within a country better align Chinese corporate activities with their domestic development objectives than others? This study examines within-country variations by comparing Sino-Cambodian infrastructure cooperation at the national level and Chinese investment in the gambling industry in Sihanoukville. It argues that the host country’s regulatory strength in combination with different varieties of capital determines the effectiveness of the government’s attempts at achieving their development objectives. Using a case study approach based on primary interviews conducted in Phnom Penh and Sihanoukville, this article finds dramatically different outcomes in the two sectors under analysis. In the infrastructure sector, we find that the high regulatory strength deployed by the line ministry in conjunction with Chinese state capital achieves the government’s infrastructure development goals. On the contrary, in the gambling industry in Sihanoukville, limited regulatory strength of the local government coupled with profit-driven short-term capital create a ‘Chinese silo’ that yields limited (or even negative) developmental outcomes. Our analysis shows that regulatory strength can shape and affect the outcomes of foreign capital. These results are supported by the analysis of two shadow cases in manufacturing and real estate. We define this state of affairs as ‘fractured development’.
作者:Calabrese, L., & Wang, Y
来源:World Development
3.《Presidential extraversion: Understanding the politics of Sino-African mega-infrastructure projects》
摘要:The past two decades have witnessed increasing scholarly analysis of China’s growing presence in Africa. How does African agency operate within the asymmetric power relations between China and African states? How do African actors use foreign-sponsored projects to achieve domestic objectives? Some analyses take a China-centered perspective, with divergent views about how Chinese economic engagement promotes or inhibits African development. Scholarly work increasingly recognizes the agency of African actors. I advance upon the African agency argument by proposing a concept of presidential extraversion. I argue that Chinese-sponsored projects in Africa have coincided with the host ruler’s strategies for political survival. Internationally, African rulers have strategized among their available options to ensure that the state received foreign finance and services on the most favorable terms. Domestically, they have instrumentalized Chinese-sponsored projects and loans to demonstrate their performance legitimacy and sustain patronage networks. I process-trace the Kenyan Standard Gauge Railway and Angolan Kilamba Kiaxi housing project, primarily relying on evidence collected in Kenya, Angola, and China from 2017 to 2019. The findings challenge the neo-dependency argument and show that despite Sino-African power asymmetry, African leaders have had the agency to shape this relationship to their advantage. The presidential extraversion argument advances upon African extraversion theory by locating the agency within the African political leaders rather than elites broadly.
作者:Wang, Y
来源: World Development
更多相关资料


